I hope the camera back? Me? pi? reliable. They will guarantee a new period of 90 days. I have to pay shipping to Sony Service Center, but they pay the shipping on the return of a camera rotates at me. Fortunately the problem? began shortly before the 90 days warranty period. She covers both parts and labor. Given this experience, I suggest buying an extended warranty for this camera.
Rating: 3 / 5

1. It is very compact. I can easily in one hand and cargo pocket shorts. It fits well in the pocket of my wife if she wanted to wear it.

2. It has an LCD touch screen? very intuitively. Did not read the instructions (well, maybe a little ‘), and above all understood everything on my own. The menu system? easy to navigate, once you understand the basics. Where? too complicated, just point and press record, and the default “auto” function to automatically adjust focus and sensitivity? light (for evening, day, night sc? nes) for quality? great. Anyone can? Use this camera! Even my technophobe wife had no problem.

3. It was built in memory, that? Why? pi? convenient than the CX150 (16 concerts is built), but I knew going in I have a 32 GB Kingston Class 4 and have about a treasure the hours of footage of their honeymoon and have enough space. I do not know much, but I would say that only about 15% – 20% of my memory. It has 4 different qualitys recoridng, 24 MB per second (the best), 19 Mbps, 12 Mbps (default), and 9 Mbps, I used the second pi? high quality (since I had a lot of memory), but I have amazing photos! I used component cables and I am waiting for my HDMI cable for true digital HD, but the picture section blew me away!

4. Optical zoom? scary good. Shivering on the people around the building and see how many cans of beer they had on their kitchen table.

5. The quality? Audio? great. You feel the wind on many of our movies, but thats why? our debt. Hearing the waves and the birds in the background are a real nice treat for our videos.

6. I am very happy with my purchase. HD? way to go and this? a powerful camera cheap. This? around us? you need a great picture for a low cost. Sony? a sign of quality, or pay 500 for something, you can also get something of quality? thats. Moreover, as the quality HD and Blu-ray video makes it for the future.

** I bought mine off eBay for $ 400 dollars, but I have my 32 MB for about $ 90. I know that Amazon sells for 500, but maybe a P? shopping will save you some money.
Rating: 5 / 5

I am very happy with my decision. I took pictures in the light of day and night, even in the video? excellent. Amazon. com? very good and I got it within 4 days after the order.

I read the review comments of the person who camcorder 2 for review. I’m surprised at the reason for the low valuation to see. Although the specifications of this camera says internal memory is not clear, do not understand why? people buy, and a low price for their mistakes.

Bottom Line, my prediction? Sony break-through and beat another competitor in 2010 camcorder.
Rating: 5 / 5

What gives? an incredible 1080 24bit HD images that will blow. My first outing? been to our local Desert Botanical Gardens to see movie and the colorful flowers, cactai, and butterflies. I used the FX-HD (high definition video quality) for video, cos? how pictures 3MEGA. When I came home and saw the movie and pictures, my mouth open with clarity and vivid, colorful beautiful 1080 on my 52 “Sony TV. The details are very sharp and no artifacts were present in the films. It was incredible.

The cameras easy to use and work with simple touch-screen, so that his function as the I-Car to help with the contrast and exposure correction. And it was fantastic to choose the sc? ne you did not rewind or fast forward more?! The only drawbacks to the camera I do not like the low battery power that comes with it, besides that their HDMI cable sold separately. All in though this is? a great camera for the price!
Rating: 4 / 5

I have a Sony DSC-TX1 digital camera? swept away by its quality? optics, and even got 720 movies that have just been more mad? clear that my one year of ET? JVC camcorder. It was then that I realized I needed to lose the JVC. Almost all the movies I have of my son, now 6 years, so the best? quality most? I would be happy. Too many artifacts in the definition JVC bottom pan was just ugly ugly ugly, and while had a great response at low brightness, image quality was not exactly what I wanted everything else as well with my TV and camera.

me? Originally the 100 version of this to get it was so incredibly cheap for a camera is 1080, but the capacity? poor low-light put me off, since most of us? that record? in my house. And the very low figures for the optical zoom I also interested people. But Amazon offers easy link just below the original product announcement as c ‘? a new version, so? I saw the 110 and the price was right. I have a number of graves at the site of Sony, a little ‘confused, that low cost is only 100 16GB built, but most end? High had not, but when I compared the specifications of rest saw, I thought it was a unit? very nice to give a test drive. My local brick and mortars do not have in stock, so I ordered from Amazon, but I delivered Saturday early Saturday, all the time to load and try.

I left all default settings except for the determination of the highest quality. This? was easy to find, and the touch screen of this device? makes it extremely easy to use. Like My Sony camera, you have a “screen that too? Can mark the six most? Used functions to save you from the menu. I love this feature, like touch my camera so easy and quick to use. < br />
So, I have four films to be tested, all the same (my 6 years playing with many Geotrax), all four options for the resolution of 1080p. The camera? more? less than I had expected, very light and fits well in hand. The only real buttons with the normal activities? the zoom and start / stop recording, well placed, despite its small size dell’unit?. Would you well as take?, who can? do during recording, the button on the top just behind the zoom,? easy reach. Thus the “use? great, no problems.
/>

Start with the most? high 24Mbps, then the next down (I think it was 17Mbps), then the “standard” one that begins, 9 Mbps, then the most? low. When I have Yes, I pulled the card (Nice, quick access to bottom with a large, sturdy, hinged door). I went into my MacBook Pro perfectly, and I started to play.

I have a 13 “MacBook Pro, aluminum unibody I about four months ago. Both new Core 2 Duo, NVIDIA 9400 … And it could do more? high or more? High quality second movie first. .. Who told me that she went to Great on my Windows Media Center 7. The third and fourth files are played, but since the handset? a 1080 screen, it looks like? well. What? I went ahead and pulled the card from the laptop, put it in my Dell running Zino my beautiful 46 “Samsung HDTV, and played them all.

One thing I do not understand? That when creating the file, it creates them in a proprietary format BluRay playback, the directory structure and all. So to make it easier for people who want to burn Blu-ray.

In any case, media center, I’m most? first quality. And my mouth and I almost had to buy diapers for adults. WOW. That was all there? I could say or think. WOW. It was just excellent, better than I expected. And? that be? fame? HD HD bad? was great for me – my first HDTV? was purchased in 1999, a large 60 “Mitsubishi Diamond television line. What? I used HD for? 10 years. And it knocked my socks off.

I had almost no artifacts or blurring or anything with the movement of the camera as I would expect from cameras. Even the blur? minimum. And the shots were just things crystal clear. I had a 1080p version of the bolt running movies on television while playing with his geotrax, cos? I zoomed in on the viewfinder to fill, and took some of the films. When playing this scene, I could not even say that it was the return match the original, which was a TV recording before, it was clear.

I was inside, a Wisconsin winter day with snow falling, and there was no direct sunlight, just across the clouds. usually only one window open, and no lights inside. And clarity and enlightenment? been excellent. Each bit could hope for.

What? I tested the quality? next down?, and blown away. How did the third and then the most? low quality. Everything looked beautiful. When I finish, I could see a difference between this and much more? high, but for what it was, and will be?, shoot (my son), I think that the end? the third most? low standard why? was still jaw droppingly good on my HDTV.

I had the card because the card 16GB 32GB? still within the range of the three-digit price, and I used to transfer files on my computer when I finished shooting it. And by setting the third grade, the standard September 1 Mbps, 25 minutes per clip uses only one. 9 GB, so I have about 3 1 / 2 hours on this card at this rate, so no need to worry about running the media for my normal use.

Display? crisp and clear, widescreen format, and record if not messy. Touch answer? was very good, but once you have something of a bottom of a menu I had to tap twice since the first unregistered selection. Took no pressure to show my key.

The still image while recording video worked very smoothly, but are not of great quality, so Andr? the camera to replace a good compromise. Can? give you a decent shot even something that would otherwise be wasted. . .

All in all this? waaaayyyyy better than I expected and more? than I even hoped. 100% satisfied with the device?.

I can not testify to the battery, because I had only five hours, and only ran about 40 or 45 minutes via the registration until now. In a few days will be? pop back here and change this with the results I’ve seen the battery life because? this? apparently the first review of this model.
Rating: 5 / 5

The new camcorder? almost the same quality? recording to Sony. The quality? Audio? even better. The size and practicality? Use? simply incomparable.
More write directly to DVD. What? now there? need to spend hours burning CDs / DVDs. Just great!
The pros may lack a memory card. I miss that with my new Canon.

But all in all a good deal are. . .
Rating: 4 / 5