Anyone who is not a professional camcorder?
I’m starting to produce video and I wonder what is the best Equiptment to buy at an affordable price. I think I want a professional camcorder for the price of a budgeter’s.
I’m starting to produce video and I wonder what is the best Equiptment to buy at an affordable price. I think I want a professional camcorder for the price of a budgeter’s.
Fill out the form below to signup to our digital camera & camcorder newsletter and we'll drop you a line when new Products come up.
Our strict privacy policy keeps your email address 100% safe & secure.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Sep | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | ||||
Great question. Here are my top picks for the best professional camera. I found the price. If you want HD: 1) Scarlet (coming soon, 2009) $ 3.0002) Sony PMW-EX1 dollari3 6000) JVC GY-HD200U dollari4 5500) Panasonic AG-HVX200 dollari5 5000) Canon XH-A1 $ 3.300Rosso Scarlet Many skeptical on Scarlet Red as a brand is relatively unknown, but I think the best professional camera under $ 10,000. No contest. With a traditional camera, such as those manufactured by Sony, Canon, etc., you’re lucky if you get one that records in true HD. That is, most cameras do not record in true 1920 x 1080 resolution, in addition to the Sony PWM-EX1, above. Scarlet Red, however, to record movies in 3K, which is about 150% resolution of 1920 x 1080 HD. All this for $ 3,000. I do not know how well you carry out when the Scarlet is released in 2009 on the color, watching movies, good power and manual controls, but I know it gives a better resolution of a camera I know of less than $ 20,000 . Therefore, the Red Scarlet is definitely worth looking into. 3K movies for less than $ 3K total steal !______________ Sony PMW-EX1 is a relatively new camcorder that records to the media card SxS tapeless. The EX1 has a resolution better than the Canon, Panasonic and JVC’s competitors, if the cards do not compress nearly as much as HDV, XDCAM. Another big advantage is that CMOS chips 3 1 / 2 are “individually, in contrast to 1 / 3″ or smaller chips in any other camera below $ 10,000. The larger your image sensor provides a much narrower depth of field, ideal for novice filmmakers who want to appear on celluloid film. The setback is that the EX1 XDCAM SxS Media format supports cards only record 25 minutes of footage in high quality card provided, and the purchase of additional cards is very costoso._______________JVC The HD200U HD200U is not Sony, Panasonic, Canon or but it is an excellent camera. Some guests have said that as the previous model, the HD110U was the second best camera for picture quality in the prosumer level, in addition to the Canon XL-H1, which is $ 8,000. I really like the HD110 and Hd200 as the only prosumer HD cameras, in addition to the XL-H1 with interchangeable lenses, instead of a built-in lens. The only problem is that HD200U not record in HD 1080p or 1080i, but instead only a low resolution is 720p. For me this is not as bad as I prefer 720p at 60 fps in 1080p at 30fps, but much less blur, but you have the decision. Many independent films are shot on the JVC HD110 and Hd200, so it’s an excellent camera, Panasonic HVX200 !_______________: The HVX200 is a good economical choice for indie director. And “excellent picture quality and excellent 24p mode. Another big upside is that the data from both the P2 cards or HDV, so really convenient. But she did pretty good picture quality as the Sony EX1, nor has interchangeable lenses, such as JVC Hd200. It is an excellent, well rounded HD camera yet. I found that excellent work with the Redrock M2 35 mm specifications perĂ².____________Canon XH-A1 XH A1 is rated as one of the best cameras out there for the combination of quality and value for money. I agree. It’s a nice camera well rounded, relatively easy to use (compared to others, at least) and is packed with many features that make it a good value. My only problem is that it has a 720p. It also lacks a true 24p mode, and instead what he calls a mode Canon 24F. According to Canon, the 2 are identical, but I really do not so.Per standard definition, which is still a good option, since HD is still new and expensive: 1) Panasonic AG-DVX100B dollari2 2500) Canon XL2 dollari3 3000) Sony DSR dollariDavvero PD170-2500 I can not decide whether I will or DVX100B XL2 best. They supported the towads DVX100B camera as a more general (and very user friendly), but again, the XL2 has interchangeable lenses. Both can record in 24p, which is a great option. The PD170 is a marvel of low total brightness, it is easy to use, but has no regels 24p.Se dit is not what you had in mind a budget, here are some decent HD cameras: 1) Sony HDR-HC3 and HDR-HC92) and Canon HV20 HDV HV30entrambi are. I highly recommend it. I can not stand mini-DVD or flash media. HDV camera is significantly better than the hard drive, not to compress the video enough tanto.Speranza that helps, and I apologize if this is not always what they had in mind. Well good luck and have fun!